Skip to main content

Followers

# साधारण खण्ड अधिनियम, 1897 के अन्तर्गत समय का संगणना Computation of time under the General Clauses Act, 1897:

 समय का संगणना Computation of time

The Computation of time under the General Clauses Act, 1897 is an important concept in the context of interpretation of statutes, as it dictates how time periods prescribed in statutes are to be calculated. This provision ensures uniformity and clarity when dealing with time-related issues in legislation.

Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897:

Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 lays down the rules for the computation of time for any legal or statutory matter. It helps clarify how time is to be calculated, particularly when time frames are prescribed in any statutory law, order, rule, or regulation.

Key Provisions of Section 9:

1.            Inclusion of the First Day:

o             Rule: When a time period is prescribed for doing something "from a particular day" or "after a particular day," the day from which the time is to be computed is included in the calculation.

o             Example: If an act is required to be done within 30 days from January 1, the 1st of January is counted as the first day, and the 30th day will be the 30th of January.

2.            Exclusion of the Last Day:

o             Rule: The last day of the time period is excluded when computing time. The deadline for doing something will be on the last day of the time period, but it will not count as part of the time span.

o             Example: If an act is required to be done within 30 days from January 1, the last day for performing the act will be January 30, but January 30 is not counted as part of the 30 days.

3.            Computation for Fractions of a Day:

o             Rule: If the period is expressed in terms of days, and it includes a fraction of a day, the computation of time begins from the beginning of the next day.

o             Example: If an action needs to be completed within 1 day from 5 p.m. on January 1, it would be counted as starting from January 2, 12 a.m.

4.            Exclusion of Holidays (In some cases):

o             Rule: If the last day of the prescribed period falls on a public holiday, the time limit is extended to the next working day.

o             Example: If the deadline is December 25th and December 25th is a holiday, the deadline would extend to December 26th.

Application of the Computation of Time in Interpretation of Statutes:

Courts refer to the rules of time computation in the General Clauses Act when interpreting provisions of a statute that prescribe a time limit. These rules are crucial for determining whether actions were taken within the prescribed time frame and for resolving issues related to time limits.

Examples of Computation of Time in Decided Cases:

1.            In the case of Shankar Lal v. Union of India (1991):

o             Issue: Whether the time prescribed for filing an appeal had been adhered to, considering that the last day fell on a public holiday.

o             Court's Ruling: The court followed the rules under the General Clauses Act, noting that since the last day was a holiday, the appeal could be filed on the next working day.

2.            In the case of M/s. M.R. Narayana Murthy v. The State of Karnataka (1992):

o             Issue: The issue was whether the time limit for submitting a response to a show cause notice was properly computed under the General Clauses Act, especially considering weekends and holidays.

o             Court's Ruling: The court held that the computation of time must follow the provisions of the General Clauses Act, ensuring that weekends and holidays were excluded from the calculation of the time limit.

3.            In K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1993):

o             Issue: A statute required a time frame for submitting documents, and there was confusion regarding whether to include the start date in the computation.

o             Court's Ruling: The court applied the General Clauses Act, clarifying that the time should be computed starting from the day after the specified date, with the start day being included but not the last day.

Importance in Statutory Interpretation:

             Uniformity and Predictability: Section 9 provides a clear, uniform method for calculating time, making it easier for both courts and individuals to understand and comply with time-related provisions of statutes.

             Clarification of Ambiguity: Statutes often do not explicitly mention how to calculate time, but with Section 9, there is clarity on how to interpret the time frame provided by the statute.

             Protecting Rights: The provisions help protect the rights of individuals by ensuring they are not unfairly penalized due to ambiguity in time-related terms in statutes.

Conclusion:

The Computation of Time under the General Clauses Act, 1897 is a fundamental aspect of statutory interpretation. It establishes clear and consistent guidelines for determining time periods in legal matters, ensuring fairness and predictability in the enforcement of laws. Courts use these provisions to decide whether actions are taken within prescribed limits and to resolve disputes over the correct calculation of time under statutory provisions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...